Among the subjects of interest to the pioneers
of a country, are the
PUBLIC ROADS AND CONVEYANCES.
“The first settlers,” say my Notes, “opened a road,
in the Fall of 1806, to the vicinity where Paris (Preble Co., Ohio,) now
stands. This was the beginning of their route to Cincinnati. Their object
in going to this point, so much aside from a direct line to the city,
was to avail themselves of a road opened by David Purviance, James Flemming,
and others, from that place (where they resided) to Cincinnati.
“In the course of the summer of 1807, however, the pioneers established
a nearer route, running to Eaton into Wayne’s Trace, which led to
Hamilton.
“A county road was early established along the lands of Jeremiah
Meek, Alex. Grimes, &c., down the hill-side to Cox’s Mill, and
thence up the ravine between Boat-hill and Buhl’s brewery; the land
on which Richmond stands then having no roads passing over it.”
It was considered a great advance in our intercourse with the world,
when, in 1847-8, a four and six-horse omnibus connected us with Cincinnati.
Competition for a short time reduced the fare to 50 cents a passenger;
but, in 1849, Vorhees & Co.’s line only running, the fare was
fixed at $1.50.
We have already said that in the year 1824 Richmond contained 453 inhabitants.
The writer remembers that at that time there were “croakers”
among us, as they are technically called; and the language of these was:
“Richnmond has reached its zenith—there is nothing to keep
it up—you’ll now see it begin to decline.” The more
hopeful citizens pointed to the abundant water-power everywhere around
us; to the fertile lands; the crystal waters of our springs and wells;
the healthfulness of the location; the improving society; the moral character
of the population; the materials for building—stone, brick-clay,
lumber, lime, and sand. “What more,” said all these contented
ones, “could a reasonable man desire?” “All this is
true,” replied the croakers; “but when you have raised your
corn and your hogs, and ground your grain, how are you to get out from
here to a market?” The more sanguine inhabitant looked forward to
better roads; yet he hardly knew how they were to come. Cincinnati was
the chief market; the wagon was loaded up with the produce of the country—linsey-wolsey,
tow-linen, flax-linen, beeswax, beans, ginseng, feathers, rags, lard,
sugar, butter, hogs, flour, &c.; and, according to the state of the
roads, two or three days were spent in getting to the city, and as many
returning home. High waters and muddy roads would often cause the printers
to stop the press, for want of his ream of paper or keg of ink, and the
merchant to curtail his sales, for want of goods. The ardently looked
for wagon would sometimes not arrive for one or two weeks.
But still, Richmond continued slowly to improve; and the next record
of its population we find was made in 1826, [End of page 26] when it was
648 (16 being colord persons). In the year 1827, it reached 716—380
males; 293 females; 43 colored persons. In 1828, it numbered 824 citizens—of
these, there were 427 white males, 347 white females, and 50 colored persons.
And now a
NEW ERA
was about to dawn upon Richmond, and the croaker’s voice to be
silenced for a time. Many hearts were made glad when the Public Leger,
in 1828, made the following announcement:
“National Road.—Mr. Knight has completed the location
to this place, which is 4 miles, 26 chains, 17 links, from the State
line. He is now engaged between this and Centerville, which is also
made a point. He thinks it probable that he will locate as far as Vandalia,
the capital of Illinois, the present season.”
And the State pride of our citizens was not a little exalted when they
read, in Jonathan Knight’s Report of his survey, that he had “never
passed through a greater extent of uniformly rich land, than on the route
through Indiana. It is well watered,” he continues, “as may
be inferred from the maps, and from the estimates of the bridge-work.”
The whole estimated cost of bridging and masonry was given at $313,099.00;
the whole length of the road across the State was 149¼ miles. The
Report was read with avidity by our little population, and the following
notice with pleasure:
“From the State line, the road “proceeds, by a very direct
route, over an undulating surface, to Richmond, a thriving and respectable
village situate on the east side of the east fork of Whitewater, in
Wayne county, about four and a-half miles from the State line.”
Richmond was soon to breathe more freely, east and west, along this
noble National Road. It was now admitted, even by those who looked on
the dark side of the slowly progressive village, that Richmond would receive
a temporary impulse by the construction of this great thoroughfare. Little
did any of us then dream of well-made turnpikes leaving Richmond at almost
every point of the compass, and of railroads, connecting us with all the
large cities around us—and, indeed, with nearly all the large cities
of the vast Union. That day, however, was advancing. Meanwhile, the Public
Leger was not idle in stimulating the citizens to make the place
more and more desirable as a residence. We give the following sample of
an editorial in 1827:
“VILLAGE IMPROVEMENT.—The streets of our village, though
considerably improved last year, yet require much labor to render them
complete. In a number of places, after rain, water stands until evaporation
carries it off. This is not only disgusting to the sight, but it is
injurious to health. Such things ought not to be in a village improving
in other respects as this is. It belongs to the appropriate officers
to take the lead; and then individuals, no doubt, will contribute their
exertions. Beside the improvements of the streets, there are other subjects
worthy the attention of the citizens. Shade-trees afford so delightful
a prospect, so much enhance the beauty and interest of a place, and
are withal so wholesome, that every owner of a lot should set them out
in front of it. The labor and expense would be trifling.
Protection against fire is much needed. Built, as the houses principally
are, of wood, a single fire might sweep at once the promising village
into ruins. All these subjects are worthy of attention, and ought to
be acted upon.”
These suggestions were not lost upon the community. Here and there an
improvement was made in the streets, pavements, houses and lots, as means
admitted. Shade-trees began to be planted out; but as for “protection
against fire,” it was thought that care would have to supply the
place of fire-engines, while the town was so poor. Fires, indeed, were
rare; and when they did occur, it was as often from lightning as otherwise.
One or two incendiary instances are within recollection of the writer,
as well as a stable or so consumed by lightning. But, combustible as the
materials of the houses were, no neighboring buildings took fire, and
no conflagration has ever occurred in Richmond.
Previous to this, the difficulties of
COMMERCIAL INTERCOURSE
may be partially inferred from the following memorandum, made by the
present writer some years ago:
“In 1810, Bacon sold 2½ cents per lb.; Corn, 20 to 25
cents per bushel—but there was a season of great scarcity, when
it sold for $1.25 per bushel—perhaps in 1819. Sugar was manufactured
from the sugar-tree in large quantities, and sold here at 3, 4, and
6 cents per lb., while hogsheads of it were taken to the South in exchange
for raw cotton, which, being in great demand here, was woven by the
women, and the fabrics brought to the stores here to sell. Butter for
a long time sold at 3, 4, and 6 cents per lb.; Wheat, at 37½
to 50 cents; Oats, in 1820, were 8 cents per bushel; Apples, at the
earlieat periods, were brought from Redstone, Pa., by way of Cincinnati,
and sold at $1 to $1.50 per bushel. ‘Many a time,’ said
an old woman, ‘have I paid Robert Morrisson fifty cents a-yard
for muslin, which can now be bought for eight and ten cents, and I have
paid for it, too, with butter and sugar at six cents a pound.’
“John Smith commenced a store in a log building, near his present
brick house, in 1810. Robert Morrisson began another in 1814, in a frame
building on lot No. 1 of Cox’s sale. He afterwards effected an
arrangement with John Smith, to enter into co-partnership; but before
his goods were removed into the new store (a frame house on lot No.
1, Smith’s side,) his own building, with nearly all its contents—$500
worth—was consumed by fire. Smith & Morrisson finally dissolved,
and a new firm was established, under the title of Smith & Frost.
Their store was kept in the building on Pearl-street, lot 45. Frost
(Edward) afterward kept a store on Front-street, lot 33, in the present
frame building, which was also occupied by my father, in 1823, for the
same purpose.
“’I used to take in eight or ten barrels of country sugar
a-day,’ said one of these merchants; there was an abundance made
here at that time. I recollect sending much to Kentucky and Tennessee,
and exchanging it profitably for cotton. I once sent three wagon-loads
to Lexington, Ky.’”
Books, in that day, appear to have been as inaccessible and as scarce
as cotton. “A copy of Clarkson’s Portraiture of Quakerism
being offered for sale here,” said Robert Hill to the writer, “at
one dollar a volume (3 volumes), as I was too poor to buy it, Jeremiah
Cox and I agreed to take it together, he buying two of the volumes, and
I the other.”
Another early necessity of a thriving village is a
TAN-YARD.
Two of these were established here in 1818: the first by John Smith,
for the benefit of Joseph Wilmot, a dwarfish Englishman, and the other
by Robert Morrisson. Smith’s tan-yard was near his dwelling, and
is now owned by the Wigginses. Morrisson’s once boasted 70 vats,
and was on Main-street, north side, between Washington and Green streets.
It was discontinued many years ago.
I quote again from my own manuscript of 1848.
STREETS AND IMPROVEMENTS.
In one of my old almanacs I find the following memorandum: “1826—this
year gutters were made on the sides of the streets, and they were otherwise
improved.” Until this period, the streets furnished pasture for
our rambling cattle. Perhaps, here and there might be seen a short row
of rough curb-stones, intended to separate a few loads of tanbark, or
of gravel, or some equally rough flat stones from the streets; but in
general, sidewalks and streets were one. And where gutters were ploughed,
where some dry curb-stones might be, quite a lively emotion was created
in the minds of the townspeople, who flocked to the line of internal improvement,
and discussed the advantages of having suitable drains for the water.
To cross a street in that day in wet weather was a formidable undertaking.
Horse-racks, of materials and structure, in perfect keeping with the
humble pretensions of the village, stood a yard or two in the streets,
or a foot or two on the sidewalk, according to the taste or convenience
of the owner. And in 1826, when the “marshal,” (Isaac Beeson,
the potter,) was ordered to cut down all the racks which trespassed upon
the streets, if not removed within a given time, the question was raised
by those immediately interested in the case, whether the town authorities
had not transcended their legitimate powers in thus dealing with the “hitching
places;” but on the day appointed, when the officer appeared with
his axe to lay low one of the lawless racks, (he and the owner very amicably
acting in sly concert to alarm the unwilling ones,) mattocks and spades
speedily came to the rescue of the threatened structures; and the posts
were forthwith dug up, and afterward replanted at the ordained distance
from the lots.
__________
BUILDINGS.
When the proprietor, John Smith, erected his large brick house in 1811—now
standing on Market street, west of Front—it was considered the most
spacious building in the territory. He showed me, in 1826, on the adjoining
lot, his first humble cabin, and the log store house hard by, in which
he formerly sold goods to the Indians; and remarked with a smile, that
the celebrated warrior Tecumseh, yet owed him a ’coon-skin, for
a balance due on some ammunition.—On my lot (No. 18,) at the south-west
corner south Front street, there stood in 1828 a low log house, twelve
by eight feet, occupied originally perhaps as a dwelling place, then as
a smith’s shop;* and afterwards again as a potter’s dwelling
house. The pottery was a long frame building immediately opposite; it
was torn down about the year 1824, having been occupied by Eleazar Hiatt,
Isaac Beeson, Geo. Bell, (a mulatto,) and John Scott; all of whom are
now living, except the last, who died of cholera spasmodica in 1833. The
house on the north-west corner of Front and Walnut streets is one of the
oldest buildings in the town; and was built and occupied by William Williams,
who used the log cabin on my lot for his smith shop; it formerly had a
long porch in front, and a stone chimney stood outside at the north end
of the house. The subsequent repairs have greatly concealed its former
antiquated appearance. The frame house too, north of me on lot fifteen,
is one of kindred age; and once had a sort of porch-floor extending over
the sidewalk and forming a pavement for the passing citizen, as well as
dry resting place, for those who chose to sit and talk.—I hold in
distinct remembrance the old log meeting house of 1823, standing near
the site of the present large brick one. I remember its leaky roof, letting
the rain through upon the slab benches with three pair of legs and no
backs; its charcoal fires kept in sugar kettles; (for as yet stoves were
not procured;) and the toes pinched with cold, of the young who sat remote
from the kettles. Happily for the inmates, the air entered the room through
numberless crevices of no small dimensions, or the whole congregation
might have been suffocated by the baleful fires. In 1827 was consumed
by fire a log building on lot six, put up in 1816 for a tavern, by Philip
Harter, who kept entertainment in it. This was the first inn. In the present
year (1848) David Hoover pointed to the log building on Charles W. Starr’s
farm, near the tan-yard on Fifth street, and remarked that that was the
first hewed log house put up in town, now twenty-two years old.
*On the south-east quarter of lot No.18, is yet to be
seen the soil blackened by the dust of an old “coal pit” which
was formed upon the spot.
__________
THE FIRST BREWERY
in Richmond was commenced by Ezra Boswell (already named), about the
time the town was incorporated. Of the quality of the beer we have now
no opportunity of forming a judgment; but it is said that some of the
Councilmen of that day—who, of course, served their fellow-citizens
gratuitously—one day sent to Ezra for some of his brewing; and we
presume, they quaffed it until they were satisfied; but, like all men
in place, they, by this simple act, subjected themselves to the tongue
of slander. By the citizens, who took it upon themselves to watch over
the pecuniary interests of the place, a rumor was set afloat that the
Councilmen were drinking beer at the expense of the corporation. The price
of beer, sold at taverns, was in that day fixed by the court at 12½
cents a quart; while the same authority rated whiskey, per half-pint,
at 12½ cents; the same quantity of common brandy, at 18¾
cents, and cognaic [sic cognac], rum, and wine were to be sold
at 37½ cents by the half pint. The care of the Court in this particular
is further evinced by their allowing George Hunt, clerk, a certain sum
for the purchase of whisky, during the sale of lots in Salisbury.
The squirrel, in these early days, not only furnished many a meal for
the resident, but they abounded to a degree that made them a nuisance,
and the farmer was glad to invite the sportsman from town to visit his
corn-fields, which were seriously molested by these nimble depredators
every year. Other quadruped vermin also often annoyed his farm-yard. Wolves
were a source of much anxiety and trouble, as well as loss. It is curious
to find a reocrd on the minutes of the Court, allowing Robert Morrison
[sic Morrisson] one dollar and a half for two wolf-skins. Bears
were sometimes killed; and, even so late as 1827, according to a paragraph
in the Public Leger (a newspaper hereafter to be noticed), several
of these animals visited the vicinity of Richmond; and “their appearance,”
says the editor, “has roused the spirits pf some of our sportsmen,
who seem disposed to pay them all appropriate respect.”
__________
THE FIRST POST OFFICE
was established in 1818, and Robert Morrisson received the first commission
as Postmaster. He opened the office in a frame building, at the southwest
corner of Main and Front streets, where he also kept a store. The office
and store were afterward removed to the northwest corner of Main and Pearl
streets, also in a frame building, which was recently moved along Pearl-street,
and now stands opposite to the Warner Buidling. Robert Morrisson held
the office till 1829, when he resigned, and the appointment passed into
the hands of Daniel Reid, who for a while taught school in the neighborhood.
These individuals are still living.
Robert Morrisson informs me that the mail at that early period was brought
here on horseback, once in two weeks, according to stipulation; but that,
in consequence of high water (and the streams were not then bridged),
and impassably muddy roads, the post-boy sometimes did not arrive for
four or five weeks. The returns, made quarterly, amounted to two or three
dollars, contrasting strangely with the present net proceeds of the office,
these being, in the year 1856, $1,407.13.
__________
THE FIRST TAVERN,
which the writer remembers, stood at the northeast corner of Main and
Pearl streets, with the sign of a “Green Tree,” and was kept
by Jonathan Bayles. (From a memoradum in possession of the writer, it
appears that there was an earlier inn kept by Philip Harter, in a log
building, in 1816, on lot No. 6, south Pearl-street, and already alluded
to.) Another, of later date, was on Front-street, near the south-west
corner of Main, and was kept by Ephraim Lacey. The first was a two-story
red brick building; the last a two-story white frame.* Both these inn-keepers
are deceased.
*This hotel was discontinued about the year 1828;
for, in that year, I find the following advertisement in the “Public
Leger:”
FOR SALE
THAT well-known TAVERN STAND,
In the Town of Richmond, lately the
occupation of Wm. H. Vaughan. A bargain will be given, and possession
at any time that will suit the purchaser.
EPHRAIM LACEY
__________
THE FIRST LAWYERS
were one —– Hardy, who boarded at Ephraim Lacey’s tavern
and walked the pavement (such as it was), with his thumbs stuck in the
arm-holes of his vest, and his head pompously thrown back, spouting the
phrase, “Qui facit per alium, facit per se;” but
still no business came, and he concluded “to go further south, where
merit was better rewarded.”
John D. Vaughan was here before the year 1828, and died of cholera in
1833. He was from Wilmington, Deleware. In 1826, John B. Chapman advertises
himself in the Public Leger, as (“late of Virginia,”)
“Attorney and Counsellor at Law,” &c.†
The late Charles W. Starr signifying to one of our lawyers that he thought,
as a class, they were of little service to a community, the lawyer sharply
replied: “Why, then, do you employ us?” “For the same
reason,” said Charles, “that I would use a dung-fork —to
pitch a nuisance out of the way, which I would not handle with my own
fingers!”
†Foster P. Wright was here in 1829. He was a young
lawyer, unmarried, and sometimes wrote poetry.
__________
THE FIRST DOCTORS.
One “Dr. Cushman” is said to have come to Richmond in 1820,
and to have lived here a few years. He was a lame man, says an informant,
and he opened a distillery at the south part of town, on the side of the
hill on Front-street, near a spring. A large portion of the inhabitants
at that time being Friends (commonly called Quakers), this enterprise
did not succeed, and the establishement passed into the hands of Dr. Warner,
who also soon abandoned it, and it went down to rise no more. Dr. Cushman
returned to Fort Wayne, whence he came, and where he was an associate
judge.
Dr. Warner was the principal physician in this place for many years.
It is by his liberality the city is now in possession of what has been
called, and is still familiarly known as, the “Warner Building.”
The following obituary notice of this physician will not only mark the
date of his death, but throw a little light (perhaps enough,) upon the
character of the man, as he lived among us, to satisfy the reader. The
Palladium, in which the notice appeared, is dated “March
14th, 1835:”
“We would gladly have been spared the painful occasion requiring
the announcement of the death of one of our oldest and most useful citizens.
On Tuesday last, Dr. ITHAMER WARNER departed this life, after an illness
of a few days, aged about fifty-two years. Having resided in this county
since 1815, where he has had an immense practice in his profession,
and by industry and economy accumulated a handsome fortune, he of course
became generally known, and with the exception of some peculiarities
in his disposition, which occasionally gave offence, he was highly esteemed.
Imperfection is stamped on humanity—none can claim exemption from
it, but it is not derogatory to our remaining citizens to say, that
very few if any of them would be more missed if taken from this community,
than he who has gone down to the grave, without child to mourn a father’s
exit, or bosom companion to wail a widow’s bereavement.”
Though not an alumnus of any college, Dr. Warner was a man of strong
natural abilities, physically and mentally. His place of nativity was
New England. He never married.
Dr. William Pugh was a small man, in feeble health. He removed to Centerville
about the 1824, where he soon after died.
Dr. James R. Mendenhall, who is yet living, commenced practice in this
place in the year 1822, and retired from the profession in 1830. He was
the first graduate of medicine who settled here.
According to written information furnished to the present writer, at
his request some years since, and now before him, Dr. Thomas Carroll,
who is now practicing in Cincinnati, settled in Richmond in the year 1819,
and left early in 1823. Dr. Carroll was probably the first physician in
Richmond.
|