![]() |
Part
Three
|
|
The editor of the Leger in1827, urged the importance of home manufactures. “The opinion,” says he, “seems generally to prevail, that the establishment of manufactures among us, is the only means by which our situation can be rendered really prosperous. Our luxurious farms,” he adds, “would yield a surplus produce. But no one will deny that if there were a good home market, the progress of improvement would be much more rapid.” His opinion was, that “not one-third of the land was cultivated that might be, or that would be were there a lively and good market for their produce. “Since then,” he continues, “manufactures promise so much, it becomes us to foster the infant establishements already among us, and induce more.” These infant establishments are thus exhibited:
The Brewery alluded to, was conducted in the same place in which “old Dr. Cushman” & Co. opened their distillery. It was scarcely more successful than the distillery; and was soon discontinued. The “hope” of the editor was disappointed by the sickness and death of the proprietor of the paper-mill; his demise took place in the spring of 1828. He was a Baltimorean; and resided here but a few few years previous to his death. The project of establishing a Paper-mill, however, was not abandoned; and was finally put in operation by Leeds & Jones, under the superintendence of John Easton, in the year 1830. __________ As usual in new countries, our commercial men performed the part of dealers in silks and mackerel, gauze and tar, feathers and iron, flour and arsenic, potatoes and medicine; everything indeed, that was in demand, and would yield a profit. They competed with the tanner in the purchase of hides, and sale of “eastern tanned leather;” with the butcher in paying “cash for fat cattle;” and with the jeweler in the sale of spectacles. They were the only grocers, the only booksellers and stationers, the only iron-mongers and the only druggists. It was considerd quite an adventure when Haines & Farquhar commenced an independent Grocery in 1838; and Benton & Fletcher a Hardware Store in 1846. The first Drugstore is definitely announced in the annexed advertisement, taken from the “Public Leger,” of the date named. The parties were Dr. Warner & Robert Morrisson:
But those times have gone by; and labor and business are divided into almost as many branches as are to be found in the larger cities; and the wants of the citizen can now be very generally supplied at home, as will be evinced by the accompanying Directory. The curious reader may be entertained by comparing the subjoined enumeration of the business part of Richmond in 1824, with the present mechanical, mercantile and professional division of our population. “Several gentlemen,” says the Public Leger of the foregoing date, “having taken the census of this place, have handed it to us for publication,” viz:
From the typography at the close of the quotation, we imagine the editor fairly chuckled at the meagre number of some professional characters, and the total absence of others. Potters have long since disappeared from our city: on enquiry into the cause, some years since, I learned that this was owing to the difficulty of procuring suitable clay, at remunerative prices. Our taverns have diminished in number, in consequence of the late changes in the mode of traveling. In the following year, the Leger might have added another calling to this catalogue, as boldly announced in this advertisement:
__________ Our literary antiquarians may be interested in knowing that a “RICHMOND LIBRARY” was incorporated and established in the year 1826. An ordinary family book-case held the collection; and it was moved from place to place as the trustees could find a librarian to keep it. Our medical friends may relish the following singular historical items of their profession. It is the earliest notice of a DISTRICT MEDICAL SOCIETY In this county, that I have met with. Its limits however, appear to have been very extensive; embracing no less than five counties:
___________ ‘Neatly put up in papers,” were furnished to our merchants, by the “Shakers of Union Village, Ohio,” as early as the year 1824. __________ Richmond has always had the reputation of being a healthy situation. The site which it occupies has never been subject to the diseases so often incident to newly settled districts. The first inhabitants attained a good old age, as is elsewhere particularly shown, (see First Settlers,) and their descendants and successors have greatly multiplied under the salubrious sky. In 1821, the “Weekly Intelligencer’ mentions the situation of the town as “remarkably healthy.” And under date of 7th mo. 24th, 1824, a death is announced in the “Public Leger:”
And I well remember that this death, the only one during nearly nine months, in a population of almost a thousand, created such a sensation, throughout the village, that an enquiry was set on foot to ascertain the cause of the sickness, and if possible, to remove it, that others might not fall victims to it. No other ostensible cause appearing, the citizens, duly armed with scythes and rakes, met upon the commons, mowed the abundant dog-fennel, (Maruta cotula,) raked into heaps and burned it. In the days of the “Public Leger” at Richmond, and the “Western Emporium” at Centreville, there was a good deal of sparring between the editors on behalf of their respective villages. Among the subjects commented upon was the comparative healthiness of the two places. This contest furnishes us with an item concerning the health of Richmond up to the year 1825; as well as the conjectural population at that time within a certain area. We copy all that concerns our present purpose in the following language: “For these reasons we notice a report circulated by Judge SCOTT, that SEVEN persons have been buried in the grave-yard at this place in ONE DAY. When it is known that the farmers within a square of five miles, besides the citizens of the town, making in the whole between 2,500 and 3000 individuals, bury their dead at the same place, the number will not appear very great. But persons who have resided in the town ever since it was first laid off, declare, that there never were seven persons buried in ONE WEEK, in this place.” According to the statements of Dr. Carrol furnished to the present writer, the diseases of Wayne county from 1819 to 1823 were principally intermittent and remittent fever, sometimes passing into a congestive form. A manuscript written in 1844 states, that intermittent fever “has never been prevalent.” And an early inhabitant informed the writer that “no intermittent fever was known for six to ten years after the first emigration to this country.” And now a word for later periods. I find the following in the “Richmond Palladium:” “The number of deaths in the city of Richmond during the month of August, 1857, were–
This is generally the most fatal month for children in this latitude, and yet in a population of 6000, there appears to have been but six deaths during this month, and all of these children under four years of age. The readers may conclude that this has been an extraordinary season of healthfulness. The writer has kept a record of deaths furnished him by the sexton and undertaker for the last ten years, and the result is that the number of deaths monthly for that period, does not exceed five! In the years 1850-1, they scarcely exceeded two per month. In 1853, the deaths were between three and four monthly. These numbers include accidental deaths, as well as deaths from all other causes; and a few not citizens. During the violence of cholera in the year 1849, there were two months in which the deaths from that cause perhaps somewhat exceeded twenty. |
||||||||
| Part 2 | ||||||||
Return to the Local History Home
©Morrisson-Reeves Library, Richmond,
Indiana U.S.A.
http://www.mrlinfo.org
E-mail our Archivist archive@mrlinfo.org